The Doctrine

Deterministic by construction.
Verifiable by evidence.

Two promises hold up everything Klaritee produces. The first is how the answer is made. The second is how you prove it. One says we did not guess. The other says you do not have to take our word for it.

Pillar One / The Sealed Proof Path

No AI in the verdict.

The difference is where the guessing lives. Everyone in this category now says deterministic. The honest question is whether a probabilistic component ever touches the outcome. For most, it does. For Klaritee, it never does.

Other deterministic engines
Deterministic reasoning placed alongside AI that still guesses.
DATAREASONING+ LLMVERDICTguessing on the path
A probabilistic component sits on the path to the outcome. When someone asks whether AI touched this answer, the honest answer is yes.
Klaritee
The AI is exiled from the verdict. It speaks only after the ruling is sealed.
DATARULESSEALEDVERDICTARTIFACTLLM (outside)plain words only,after the seal
Nothing probabilistic ever touches the verdict. When someone asks whether AI made this call, the answer is no, and the artifact shows it.
Pillar Two / The M.O.A.T.

Klaritee Output. Verified Outcome.

Every finding points to the exact sentence it came from. Every result carries a sealed proof chain. Below is a real Sentinel evaluation. The scenario, entities, and events are entirely fictional. Output was produced by the engine and is rendered verbatim.

Total Claims
15
Supported
0
Interpolated
2
Unsupported
13
Overall VCI
0.0966
Integrity Band
Silver
CLM-001ASSESSMENT — KLARITEE-SAMPLE-001 · Classification: UNCLASSIFIED // NOTIONAL SAMPLE ONLYUnsupported0.0522›
CLM-002We assess with high confidence that the fictional Miran Shipping Consortium has shifted its primary transit corridor north of Marker 7Interpolated0.2150›
CLM-003This change is consistent with deliberate route concealmentUnsupported0.0906›
CLM-004Three independent reporting streams corroborate the northward shiftUnsupported0.1536›
CLM-005HUMINT from two separate sourcesUnsupported0.0000›
CLM-006commercial satellite imagery from January through MarchInterpolated0.2150›
CLM-007an intercepted internal routing directive dated 14 FebruaryUnsupported0.0759›
CLM-008The most recent transit observed in satellite imagery was 22 MarchUnsupported0.0910›
CLM-009a follow-on transit is probable within the next two weeksUnsupported0.0522›
CLM-010One alternative explanation was considered and rejectedUnsupported0.0660›
CLM-011the northern corridor could reflect seasonal shallow-water avoidance rather than deliberate concealmentUnsupported0.0660›
CLM-012This alternative is inconsistent with the February routing directive, which explicitly references Marker 7 as an exclusion zoneUnsupported0.0826›
CLM-013Confidence in this assessment is highUnsupported0.0660›
CLM-014The primary limitation is that HUMINT source two has not been independently corroborated on prior reportingUnsupported0.0660›
CLM-015the satellite pass schedule provides only partial daylight coverage of the strait during this periodUnsupported0.0660›